Events

Loading Events

Past Events

Events Search and Views Navigation

Event Views Navigation

March 2013

Prof. Dr. Yasuhiro Okuda – Japanisches Immigrationsrecht: historische Entwicklung und Gegenwart

11. March 2013, 18:00
Juridicum – SEM 64 – Stiege 2 / Staircase 2 – 6. Stock / 6th Floor, Schottenbastei 10 - 16
1010 Wien - Vienna, 1010 Austria
+ Google Map

Der Vortragende gibt einen Überblick auf die historische Entwicklung des japanischen Immigrationsrechts und erörtert die Beziehungen zu benachbarten Rechtsgebieten wie IPR, Staatsangehörigkeitsrecht, und Menschenrechtskonventionen. Er beginnt mit der Geschichte seit dem 16. Jahrhundert, als die ersten Europäer Japan erreichten, um dem Zuhörer eine konkrete Vorstellung vom Land zu vermitteln. Danach betrachtet er Gesetze in angrenzenden Rechtsgebieten, deren Funktion durch das Immigrationsrecht beschränkt wird. Diese Gesetze regulieren die rechtliche Stellung von Ausländern, die erst dann abgesichert ist, wenn die Betroffenen in Japan wohnberechtigt sind. Der Vortragende argumentiert, dass das Immigrationsrecht und die angrenzenden Rechtsgebiete eng verbunden betrachtet werden sollten.

Find out more »

December 2012

Dr. Andrey Shirvindt – Das Schuldverhältnis in der Reform des russischen Zivilgesetzbuches

3. December 2012, 18:30
Juridicum – SEM 51 / Staircase 1 / 5th Floor, Schottenbastei 10 - 16
Wien, 1010 Austria
+ Google Map

Eine tiefgreifende Reform des zentralen Kodifikationswerks lädt zu einer Grundlagendiskussion ein. Damit Gesetzesänderungen die erwünschten Erfolge zeitigen, bedarf es der Rückbesinnung auf den bestehenden Rechtsbestand. Überlieferte Institute und Begriffe, die im Alltag der Rechtsanwendung bzw. Gesetzesauslegung unkritisch als selbstverständlich wahrgenommen werden, erscheinen bei Reformprojekten plötzlich problematisch. Zahlreiche Entwürfe, die heute die existierenden Formen des juristischen Denkens de lege ferenda in Frage stellen und eine Rechtfertigung von jenen herausfordern, die möglicherweise Bedenken gegen Reformen hegen, belegen oft mangelnde Einsicht in die historischen und dogmatischen Grundlagen der betroffenen Rechtsordnung und Rechtstradition. Im Rahmen der umfassenden Reform des russischen Zivilrechts betreffen viele Änderungsvorschläge das allgemeine Schuldrecht. So sind etwa der Inhalt des Schuldverhältnisses, seine Systematisierung nach dem Entstehungsgrund und sein Anwendungsbereich ebenso sowie…

Find out more »

November 2012

Prof. van Hoecke – Exported European Law vs African traditions

21. November 2012, 18:00
Juridicum, Schottenbastei 10
Wien, 1010 Austria
+ Google Map

Law transfers often have not been successful because they didn’t fit with the local legal culture. Of course, such local legal cultures may be stronger in some areas, such as family law, than in others,such as air traffic regulation. In my lecture I will study the effect of legal transfers from Europe to Africa in the area of family law, as this is the area of law which is generally considered to be the most closely linked with local cultures. Examples will be drawn from several African countries, with an emphasis on Nigerian law.

Find out more »

October 2012

Prof. Talia Einhorn – The Coordinating Role of Private International Law

15. October 2012, 18:30
Juridicum – SEM 31 / Staircase 1 / 3rd Floor, Schottenbastei 10 - 16
Wien, 1010 Austria
+ Google Map

In the post-industrial era ever more goods, services, persons and capital cross national borders. Business organizations – companies, corporate groups and state-owned enterprises – “enter” and “exit” states offering goods and services according to their business needs. Each of these requires coordination of the legal systems in which the various activities take place, in order to inspire confidence that an activity undertaken in the territory of one country will not be frustrated in another. The presentation will explore the coordinating role of private international law, on an international level as well as within each national system. The legislature has to take account of cross-border effects of its legislation also when enacting statutes that, on their face, seem to concern purely…

Find out more »

June 2012

Prof. David Kershaw – The Path of Corporate Fiduciary Law

12. June 2012, 18:30
Juridicum, Schottenbastei 10
Wien, 1010 Austria
+ Google Map

Contemporary accounts of corporate legal evolution view lawmakers as highly responsive to the economic interests of both pressure groups and markets. Through this lens law is understood to be the product of pressures exerted by managers, investors, institutional shareholders and the Federal Government, and the incentives of state lawmakers to accommodate the interests of these pressure groups. This view dominates the current understanding of corporate legal evolution in the United States and is becoming highly influential in comparative accounts of corporate legal variation. This lecture sounds a note of objection: it argues that the disciplinary pendulum has swung too far toward external accounts of legal evolution and too far away from internal accounts of legal change, which view the path…

Find out more »

May 2012

Prof. Lynn D. Wardle – International Recognition of Same-Sex Marriages and the Full Faith and Credit Clause

7. May 2012, 18:30
Juridicum, Schottenbastei 10
Wien, 1010 Austria
+ Google Map

This lecture addresses the recognition of same-sex marriage in both private international law and interstate Full Faith and Credit and conflict of laws principles. It will compare the American position under the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) with the approach followed in other jurisdictions. It will review the American concept of federalism in marriage regulation, and it will consider the relevance for interjurisdictional marriage recognition of the significance of the meaning of marriage.

Find out more »

Prof. Olga Khazova – Family Law in the Post-Soviet European Territory: What does it look like?

4. May 2012, 18:00
Juridicum, Schottenbastei 10
Wien, 1010 Austria
+ Google Map

As the result of the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, new independent states were formed on European territory: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Estonia, Georgia, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Russia, and Ukraine. This served as an impetus to extensive law reforms in these countries. Family law reform was a constituent part of this revision. It had to be adapted to the new social and economic realities, which were brought to these countries together with tremendous political changes. In the former USSR, the Soviet republics did not have a lot of freedom in designing their own family laws; all the codes on marriage and the family were practically the same, being based on the Fundamentals of the Legislation of the USSR and…

Find out more »

Dr. Leander D. Loacker – Verhaltensökonomik als Erkenntnisquelle im juristischen Kontext?

3. May 2012, 18:00

Wenn und soweit Recht die Steuerung menschlichen Verhaltens zum Gegenstand hat, erscheint es durchaus nahe liegend, die Augen nicht vor den grundlegenden Erkenntnissen zu verschließen, die die Sozialwissenschaften über eben dieses menschliche Verhalten zutage gefördert haben. Das neoklassische Konzept des homo oeconomicus und die sich daraus ergebenden Schlussfolgerungen, die das heute weitgehend etablierte Kon-zept von Law & Economics charakterisieren, sind ein eindrücklicher Beleg für die Verständnis- und Erkenntnisgewinne, die sich erzielen lassen, wenn die Grenzen der eigenen Disziplin überwunden und deren Lehren (auch) dem Prüfstand extradisziplinärer Forschungsergebnisse ausgesetzt werden. Ungeachtet der Erfolgsgeschichte von Law & Economics mehren sich die Stimmen, die zwar nicht an der generellen Überzeugungskraft eines solchen interdisziplinären und insbesondere sozialwissenschaftlichen Analyseansatzes für das Phänomen Recht, aber doch…

Find out more »

April 2012

Prof. Kenneth S. Gallant – No Ex Post Facto Criminal Laws: Legality and its Meaning for Comparative and International Law

16. April 2012, 18:00
Juridicum, Schottenbastei 10
Wien, 1010 Austria
+ Google Map

The non-retroactivity of crimes and punishments has become a rule of customary international law. How it did so is an interesting and complex story about the use of comparative law in the making of international law. This rule of international human rights law can be demonstrated as rigorously from practice and opinio juris as any other rule of customary international law. It is sometimes said that less evidence of state practice is necessary to treat an international human right as customary international law. Rules of human rights law, however, are far safer and more secure if grounded in practice as well as opinio juris. Legality is an excellent tool for making such a demonstration of technique in human rights law.…

Find out more »

November 2011

Prof. Dr. Dr. Pierre Legrand – The Third Space

7. November 2011, 18:30
Juridicum – U 14 / Staircase 1 / 1st basement floor, Schottenbastei 10 - 16
Wien, 1010 Austria
+ Google Map

One constitutes oneself as a comparatist by rejecting the fixity of conceptually homogenized understandings and by marking a third location that is neither one nor the other but, disputing the territories of both, something else besides. For the comparatist-at-law, the third space is distinguishable from the laws being compared (it is neither outside or astride those laws) while not being reducible to a composite of the pre-existing laws. In the third space, there takes place a re-articulation projecting meaning beyond any signification obtaining in the situated laws. As it displaces them, the third space can properly be regarded as effectuating an othering of those laws. The third space introduces another other to the comparison-at-law (when it comes to comparison, one…

Find out more »
+ Export Events